tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18039016.post586519479178771812..comments2024-03-24T16:06:41.781-04:00Comments on Dean Collins: Security issues for "wifi - on the chip"Dean Collinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00860700133496050604noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18039016.post-10937237808765432542012-09-15T10:12:40.158-04:002012-09-15T10:12:40.158-04:00Bob,
I'm not sure I agree with you.
I mean a...Bob,<br /><br />I'm not sure I agree with you.<br /><br />I mean at the moment I physically control access to my servers and know that the ethernet ports + usb access can be controlled by physical access.<br /><br />Eg check out the banks / other financial institutions that superglue shut usb ports/physical Ethernet disconnection alarms etc<br /><br />With wifi on the chip this all becomes Dean Collinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08222027015133305237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18039016.post-31181545627221294312012-09-15T10:11:50.558-04:002012-09-15T10:11:50.558-04:00WiFi "on chip" is no more of a problem t...WiFi "on chip" is no more of a problem than Ethernet "on chip". <br /><br />It is a question of the software running the chip. <br /><br />I am grossly simplifying, but so long as the processor is in control, the relevant security question remains the processor environment and its software. The precise packaging (boards, chips, on-chip) is almost insignificant.<br /> <br />- Bob Gezelterhttp://www.rlgsc.comnoreply@blogger.com