Good article in FastCompany today about the upcoming court case for Aereo
http://www.fastcompany.com/1838490/a-tv-platform-so-disruptive-everyones-suing-it
We chat with Chet Kanojia of Aereo, the new TV-where-and-when-you-want-it service that has a few legal troubles. Could Aereo finally disrupt the loathed cable bundle--and TV altogether?
Will be interesting to see how this shakes out and if Barry Dillers/IAC investment in the "legal fees" for this startup was worth it.
If they win this will be the biggest ruling in the TV industry since the Cablevision remote DVR ruling.
As a matter of interest i looked up to see if TVCatchup (UK) and http://www.mytvr.com.au/ (Aus) were still running and it looks like they are.
Anyone want to predict which "cable channel" will be the first one to break ranks and deliver a service directly the the Aereo headend for inclusion in the paid subscription?
Cheers,
Dean
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query aereo. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query aereo. Sort by date Show all posts
Friday, May 25, 2012
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Aereo - i wonder who their lawyers are?
Internet-TV Firm Gets IAC Backing
An Internet-TV start-up backed by media veteran Barry Diller could tempt more television viewers to cut the cable cord, but it might be in for a fight from media companies.
The company, Aereo, unveiled plans on Wednesday to offer New York City residents beginning March 14 the ability to stream broadcast-TV signals over Web-enabled devices for $12 a month.
Considering Ivi.tv got shut down with an injunction last year.... http://blog.collins.net.pr/2010/10/ivi-not-gotta-licensewhatye-going-todo.html ...we'll see.
You might also want to check out the TVnow court case thats happening in Australia with Optus and Foxtel at the moment, explains some of the core copyright issues here - http://blog.collins.net.pr/2012/02/tvnow-court-case-in-australia.html
I wonder who Aereo's lawyers are? Though lets face it IAC has plenty deep pockets so expect this one to go the distance.
Cheers,
Dean
An Internet-TV start-up backed by media veteran Barry Diller could tempt more television viewers to cut the cable cord, but it might be in for a fight from media companies.
The company, Aereo, unveiled plans on Wednesday to offer New York City residents beginning March 14 the ability to stream broadcast-TV signals over Web-enabled devices for $12 a month.
Considering Ivi.tv got shut down with an injunction last year.... http://blog.collins.net.pr/2010/10/ivi-not-gotta-licensewhatye-going-todo.html ...we'll see.
You might also want to check out the TVnow court case thats happening in Australia with Optus and Foxtel at the moment, explains some of the core copyright issues here - http://blog.collins.net.pr/2012/02/tvnow-court-case-in-australia.html
I wonder who Aereo's lawyers are? Though lets face it IAC has plenty deep pockets so expect this one to go the distance.
Cheers,
Dean
Wednesday, January 27, 2016
Starry Internet gigabit wifi service
Anyone in NYC with an interest in much faster
wireless internet….
Sign up here – https://starry.com/internet#email-modal
Sign up here – https://starry.com/internet#email-modal
Still need convincing read more here - http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Aereo-Founder-Launches-Starry-Gigabit-Wireless-Service-136169
Aereo Founder Launches 'Starry' Gigabit Wireless Service -
While Aereo founder Chaitanya Kanojia failed
to disrupt television, today he unveiled a new wireless broadband carrier he
hopes will disrupt the cellular industry. At a New York launch event today
Kanojia unveiled Starry, a new wireless ISP that promises to use millimeter
wave technology to deliver gigabit wireless speeds to your home. The technology
will lean heavily on mesh networked city nodes utilizing 30GHz+ spectrum. Users
will receive both a "Starry Point" antenna that sits outside of your
window to connect to the city node, as well as a customized $350 router the
company is calling a "Starry Station." The station comes with a
touch-screen LED display that will offer an integrated speed test, a map of
participating city nodes, and how many household devices are connected. Kanojia
isn't yet revealing pricing, but claims he'll offer pricing that's "orders
of magnitude cheaper" than incumbent providers, with no usage caps. Yes,
offering gigabit wireless at low prices with no caps does sound like wishful
thinking. Konojia claims it's possible using "millimeter active phased
array technology" and hundreds of scattered rooftop nodes throughout each
city. "With Starry's technology, we can deploy and scale faster than
traditional wired networks -- at a fraction of the cost,"
Tuesday, April 09, 2013
Fox threatens to pull FTA content.....Goodbye, free TV?
http://allthingsd.com/20130408/news-corp-threatens-to-pull-fox-off-the-airwaves-if-aereo-wins/
Goodbye, free TV?
News Corp. COO Chase Carey said his conglomerate is considering moving programming from its Fox broadcast network, which viewers can receive over the air, for free, to its pay cable networks.
Carey floated the idea during a speech at a TV industry conference today, in response to a recent court ruling that gave startup Aereo the go-ahead, at least temporarily, to show programming from Fox and other broadcasters on its Web TV service, without paying for the shows.
is this really a viable option for Fox? what sort of viewer numbers would they lose? more importantly.....would this mean that they could have to allow in another content provider into their OTA slots if they move to cable only.
I'm assuming its all a bluff but curious for more details about what this really means.
Personally I think this will never ever ever ever happen...so not sure why they are even making the bluff, but curious what happens if this rolls out to other countries.
Goodbye, free TV?
News Corp. COO Chase Carey said his conglomerate is considering moving programming from its Fox broadcast network, which viewers can receive over the air, for free, to its pay cable networks.
Carey floated the idea during a speech at a TV industry conference today, in response to a recent court ruling that gave startup Aereo the go-ahead, at least temporarily, to show programming from Fox and other broadcasters on its Web TV service, without paying for the shows.
is this really a viable option for Fox? what sort of viewer numbers would they lose? more importantly.....would this mean that they could have to allow in another content provider into their OTA slots if they move to cable only.
I'm assuming its all a bluff but curious for more details about what this really means.
Personally I think this will never ever ever ever happen...so not sure why they are even making the bluff, but curious what happens if this rolls out to other countries.
Thursday, August 28, 2014
Tablet.tv
So its Aereo ....but in your house
- http://www.tvtechnology.com/news/0086/tablet-tv-prepares-for-san-francisco-beta-tests/272047
- http://www.tvtechnology.com/news/0086/tablet-tv-prepares-for-san-francisco-beta-tests/272047
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Cloudy future for Australian cloud based DVR's
Do you think Australia is going to be left behind the USA in a legal limbo with the Cloud DVR ruling last year - http://www.zdnet.com/cloud-tvrs-stop-in-wake-of-tv-now-ruling-1339338503/
Should www.MyTVR.com etc sold their soul to Channel 9 or similar and allowed one (or more) of the tv channels to buy into their cap table in order to steer the decisions a different way?
With the cablevision "remote hard drive" ruling in the USA (http://blog.collins.net.pr/search?q=cablevision) isnt there some kind of IP harmonization tack that can be tried - or even once the Aereo case works its way through the courts (saw they launched in Boston last week) is this a possible alternative challenge with the rental of "per user antennas?
Anyone closer to the action in Australia know whats going on?
Should www.MyTVR.com etc sold their soul to Channel 9 or similar and allowed one (or more) of the tv channels to buy into their cap table in order to steer the decisions a different way?
With the cablevision "remote hard drive" ruling in the USA (http://blog.collins.net.pr/search?q=cablevision) isnt there some kind of IP harmonization tack that can be tried - or even once the Aereo case works its way through the courts (saw they launched in Boston last week) is this a possible alternative challenge with the rental of "per user antennas?
Anyone closer to the action in Australia know whats going on?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)